Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 196074 (ALL)

PANKAJ JAIN v. STATE OF U.P.THRU.PRIN.SECY.AWAS and URBAN PLANNING and ORS.

WRIA/9135/2020 · 2025-12-18

Shree Prakash Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 9135 of 2020 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. 1. Case called out. 2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition. 3. Learned counsel for the State and Sri Shubam Tripathi, learned counsel for the opposite parties no. 2 & 3 are present. 4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. 5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 6. Consigned to records. December 18, 2025 AKS Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anand Mani Tripathi, R. R. Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Shubham Tripathi (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Pankaj Jain .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P.Thru.Prin.Secy.Awas And Urban Planning And Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench