LALA RAM KUREEL v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. COOPERATIVE DEPTT. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIA/12581/2025 · 2025-10-17
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 196070 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 196070 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 12581 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to implead the Managing Director, U.P. Sahkari Gramin Bank Ltd. Pradhan Karyalaya, Lucknow in the array of opposite parties as opposite party no. 4 during the course of the day.
Learned counsel for the other side has no objection. In view of the aforesaid, learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to implead the Managing Director, U.P. Sahkari Gramin Bank Ltd. Pradhan Karyalaya, Lucknow in the array of opposite parties as opposite party no. 4 during the course of the day. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State, Sri Vijay Prakash Mishra, Advocate, holding brief of Sri Vinod Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the opposite parties no. 2 to 4 and perused the record. Instant writ petition has been filed with the following reliefs :-
"(i) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties to pay the retiral dues such as Bonus, Security deposit money, Group Insurance, Encashment and amount deducted from salary for pension scheme, which have illegally been withheld by the opposite parties. (ii) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pramod Kumar Singh, Manoj Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Vinod Kumar Singh Lala Ram Kureel .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Cooperative Deptt. Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
opposite parties to pay the interest at the rate of 12% on the amount of retrial benefits from the due date till the actual date of payment." After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the interest of justice would be sub-served if this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to give liberty to the petitioner to move a fresh representation before the opposite party no. 4/ Managing Director, U.P. Sahkari Gramin Bank Ltd. Pradhan Karyalaya, Lucknow and the opposite party no. 4 may be directed to consider and decide the same within the stipulated period of time, as may be fixed by this court.
Learned counsel appearing for the opposite parties have no objection to the same. Be that as it may, without entering into the merits of the case,the petitioner is given liberty to move a fresh representation, while raising all his claims and grounds before the opposite party no. 4/ Managing Director, U.P. Sahkari Gramin Bank Ltd. Pradhan Karyalaya, Lucknow within a period of 15 days form today and if such representation is moved within aforesaid period, the opposite party no. 2 is directed to consider and decide the same within further period of two months, in accordance with law. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is hereby
disposed of. October 17, 2025AKS WRIA No. 12581 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench