VARDIREDDY VARADA REDDY @ YERRA VARADA REDDY v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP/13580/2025 · 2025-05-14
K Suresh Reddy
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 19607 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 19607 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATK (Special Original Jurisdiction) ^ In THURSDAY ,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE li UJA PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SURESH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 13580 OF 2025 Between:
1. Vardireddy Varada Reddy @ Yerra Varada Reddy, S/o Pedda Rami Reddy, Aged about 73 years. Cultivation, R/o D.No.1-42, Balupalli Village, C.K Dinne Mandal, Kadapa District. Vardire^^ Varadarajula Reddy, S/o Vardireddy Vara^ Reddy @ Yerra Varada Reddy, Aged about 40 years. Business, R/o D.No.1-42, Balupalli Village, C.K Dinne Mandal, Kadapa District:^ Vardireddy Jayachandra Reddy, S/o Vardireddy Varada Reddy @ Yerra Varada Reddy, Aged about 36 years. Business, R/o D.No.1-42 Balupalli Village, C.K Dinne Mandal, Kadapa District
2.
3. ...PETITIONERS AND
1. The State Of Andhra Pradesh^ represented by its Principal Secretary Revenue Dep^ment. Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District. The District Collector and District Magistrate, Y.S.R Kadapa District, Kadapa.
2. V . •
3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kadapa, Kadapa District.
4. The Tahsildar, C.K Dinne Mandal, C.K Dinne Mandal, Kadapa District.
...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction, especially one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in seeking to demolish the compound wall and trees in the land an extent of Ac.0.d2xts forming part of Ac.0.22.cts in S.No.19, L.P.M No.sYof Balupalli Village, C.K Dinne Mandal, Y.S.R Kadapa District, in pursuant of the
order vide Ref.NoB/03/2025, dated 03.05.2025 passed by the 4th respondent under Section 6 of The Andhra Pradesh land Encroachment Act, 1905 is not binding on the petitioners 2 and 3 who are not parties to the said Order dated 03.05.2025, is illegal, arbitrary, contrary to the Principles of Natural Justice and provisions of the Encroachment Act, 1905, and Arts 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and set aside the same and consequently direct the respondents not to dispossess the petitioners from the above said land of land as stated supra. ^ ' lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents notTo dispossess or demolish the existing compound wall and the trees in the land of an extent of Ac.0.02.cts forming part of Ac.0.22.cts in S.No.19, L.P.M No.61 of Balupalli Village, C.K Dinne Kadapa District, by suspending the
order videMandal, Y.S.R Ref.No:B/03/^25, dated 03.0^0 of the 4th respondent, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner(s): SRI. K NARSI REDDY^ Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 4; GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER
\ APHC010275192025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3239] THURSDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SURESH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 13580/202^ Between: Vardireddy Varada Reddy @ Yerra Varada Reddy and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner{S):
1.K NARSI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following Order: Questioning the impugned order, dated 03.05.2025, vide Reference No. B/03/2025 passed by the respondent, the petitioners filed the Petition. ...RESPONDENT(S) present Writ Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners as well learned counsel for the respondents.
2. i
3. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Government Pleader states that even though an appeal is provided as per *
n .o^V, 2 % Section 10 of the Andhra Pradesh Land Encroachments Act, 1905, the petitioners without availing such remedy of appeal, have filed this present writ petition. In view of the above facts and circumstances, the present Writ Petition is disposed of at the admission stage granting liberty to the petitioners to file an appeal, as provided under Section 10 of the Act, within the statutory period of 60 days. Till such time, the respondents are directed not to dispossess the petitioners or demolish the existing compound wall and trees in the subject lands.
4. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of at the admission stage. There shall be no order as to costs.
5. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
Sd/- M. PRABHAKAR RAO ASSISTANTS REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER to,
1. The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department. Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District.
2. The District Collector and District Magistrate, Y.S.R Kadapa District, Kadapa.
3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kadapa, Kadapa District.
4. The Tahsildar, C.K Dinne MaPdal, C.K Dinne Mandal, Kadapa District."
5. One CC to Sri. K Narsi Reddy Advocate [OPUC]
6. TwoCCsto GP For Revenue ,High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]
7. THREE CD Copies AL
HIGH COURT Ks j DATED:15/05/2025 VACATION COURT
ORDER WP.No.13580 of 2025 * 16 MAY 2025 ^ . Current Section .
DISPOSING OF THE W.P. AT TI^I^ADMISSION STAGE, WITHOUT COST§^