Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19605 (HP)

POOJA v. KAMALDEEP

FAO(FC)/61/2024 · 2025-04-01

Sushil Kukreja, Tarlok Singh Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 Neutral Citation No. ( 2025:HHC:8576 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA FAO(FC) No.61 of 2024 Date of Decision: 01.04.2025 _____________________________________________________ Pooja ....Appellant Versus Kamaldeep …Respondent ___________________________________________________ Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 No. ________________________________________________ For the appellant : Mr. R.L. Chaudhary, Advocate. For the respondent : Mr. Kartik Kumar, Advocate. ________________________________________________ Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge (Oral) Learned counsel for the appellant states that it is only the observations made by the learned Trial Court that are coming in the way of the appellant so as to compel her to file the instant appeal or else, she is also fully aware that such decree can not be given effect. 2. In the given facts and circumstances, we deem it appropriate to dispose of this appeal by observing that the findings rendered by the learned Trial Court shall not prejudice any of the parties in any other proceedings which may be pending 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 Neutral Citation No. ( 2025:HHC:8576 ) or may be initiated by them. Ordered accordingly. Parties are left to bear their own costs. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Judge (Sushil Kukreja) April 01, 2025 Judge (VH)