SAHID v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. DEPTT. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
BAIL/12869/2025 · 2025-12-18
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 196045 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 196045 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12869 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. Sri Prabhakar Pandey appears for the informant. 2. The accused-applicant seeks bail in FIR/Case Crime No.268 of 2025 under sections 137(2), 65(1) BNS and section 5L/6 POCSO Act, P.S. Ibrahimpur, District Ambedkar Nagar. 3. In terms of the FIR, allegations were levelled that the daughter of the informant aged about 15 years along with one Perveen aged about 14 years daughter of Aas Mohd. had left home without informing anyone. The FIR was lodged on 02.11.2025. Subsequently, in the statement under section 180, the victim admitted that she used to talk to the applicant for the last nine months and she was in love with the applicant and the applicant had called her to Ahmedabad because of which both of them when to Ahmedabad alone and where they stayed at the station for three days, however, the applicant did not met them and thereafter when they called their parents, they were taken back. No allegation of rape were levelled. In the statement under section 183 BNSS, a similar statement was given, however, it was stated that prior to their going to Ahmedabad, physical relations were formed on various occasions in between them on false pretext of marriage. There is no definite document with regard to the exact age of the victim. 4. Considering the fact that even as per the statement, the physical relations Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Arun Kumar, Ram Chandra Dwivedi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Sahid .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
were lasted on various occasions and the victim had gone to Ahemdabad on their own, a case for bail is made out more so when the applicant has no criminal history and is in custody since 17.11.2025. Thus the bail application is allowed. 5.
Let the applicant Sahid be released on bail in aforesaid FIR/Case Crime Number subject to his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. December 18, 2025 VNP/- BAIL No. 12869 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- VISHVANATH PRASAD SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench