Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19603 (GAU)

DULAL SAIKIA AND 5 ORS. v. NIREN BAISHYA AND ANR

Cont.Cas(C)/546/2024 · 2025-06-05

Kardak Ete

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010213972024 2025:GAU-AS:7420 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/546/2024 DULAL SAIKIA AND 5 ORS. SON OF LATE KHAGESWAR SAIKIA, RESIDENT OF HOUSE NO. 12 (A), PATARKUCHI, MAIKHULI ROAD, P.S. AND P.O. BASISTHA CHARIALI, DIST.- KAMRUP (M), ASSAM, PIN- 781029. 2: HITESH DEKA SON OF LATE MOHI RAM DEKA RESIDENT OF WORD NO.6 PUNANI GORAIBARI P.O. UDALGURI DIST.- UDALGURI ASSAM PIN- 784509. 3: PRATUL BASUMATARY SON OF MAKHAN LAL BASUMATARY RESIDENT OF BENGTOLA GATE P.O. NO.1 CHAPAGURI DIST.- CHIRANG ASSAM PIN- 783380. 4: DIBYAJYOTI GOGOI S/O- LATE DHARMESWAR GOGOI RESIDENT OF L.K. BARUAH ROAD P.O. GOLAGHAT DIST.- GOLAGHAT ASSAM PIN- 785621. 5: KAILASH MEDHI SON OF LATE JAGANNATH MEDHI RESIDENT OF RAMNAGAR JATIKUCHI DIST.- KAMRUP (M) Page No.# 2/3 ASSAM PIN- 781040. 6: JAGABANDHU DEKA SON OF LATE JAGNURAM DEKA RESIDENT OF BENGAPARA P.O. SARTHEBARI DIST.- BARPETA ASSAM PIN- 781037 VERSUS NIREN BAISHYA AND ANR THE CHAIRMAN, ASSAM STATE WAREHOUSING CORPORATION, PANNYAGAR BHAWAN, CHRISTIAN BASTI, GUWAHATI-781005. 2:PRADIP KR. TIMUNG MANAGING DIRECTOR ASSAM STATE WAREHOUSING CORPORATION PANNYAGAR BHAWAN CHRISTIAN BASTI GUWAHATI-5 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR C GOSWAMI, Advocate for the Respondent : MR. B D CHOWDHURY (R-1,2), MR. R SEKHAR(R-1,2) BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE O R D E R 06.06.2025. Heard Mr. C. Goswami, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. R. Sekhar, learned counsel for the alleged contemner submits that the order of this Court dated 26.06.2024, passed in WP(C) No.840/2024, has duly been complied with by yesterday. Page No.# 3/3 Accordingly, the Contempt Petition stands closed. It is needless to observe that if the issue remains to be determined, the petitioner may take recourse of the appropriate remedy, as may be permissible under the law. JUDGE Comparing Assistant