HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10114 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Shri Vijay Bahadur Yadav, the learned counsel for the petitioner states that because of certain defects in the petition, he does not want to press the present petition and he seeks liberty to file a fresh petition. 2. Shri Pankaj Srivastava, the learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed with the aforesaid liberty. 4. Let the certified copies annexed with the petition be returned to the learned counsel for the petitioner after retaining their photocopies on record. October 17, 2025 -Amit K- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vijay Bahadur Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Seraj Ahamad .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench