MANNA @ SHAH HUSAIN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. THE PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.
BAIL/2648/2025 · 2025-10-28
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 196006 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 196006 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 2648 of 2025
Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State; Shri Arjun Singh Kalhans, learned counsel for the informant and perused the record.
2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.514 of 2024, under Section 69, 352, 351(3) BNS & Section 67-A of IT Act, P.S. Kotwali Dehat, District Gonda.
3. FIR in question was lodged alleging that the applicant has formed physical relations over a span of one year on the false pretext of marriage and was now refusing to marry. A similar statement was given under Section 180 BNSS. Age of the victim is around 21 years.
4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.
5. Considering the fact that the relationship lasted over a span of one year admittedly, the applicant who is in custody since 07.12.2024 and has one case of criminal history in which he is on bail, is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed.
6. Let the applicant Manna @ Shah Husain be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Piyush Kumar Singh, Alok Kumar Tiwari, Rama Pati Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Arjun Singh Kalhans, Purooshottam Verma Manna @ Shah Husain .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. The Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 28, 2025 nishant BAIL No. 2648 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- NISHANT MOHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench