HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 10654 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Mohan Singh, learned counsel for respondent no. 6, Mr. Prashan Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for respondent no. 5, Mr. Brijendra Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State and perused the record. Instant petition has been filed with the following reliefs:- "i..Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of CERTIORARI thereby quashing the impugned order/ notice through Patrank / NRLM Maganpur Mahimapur/Notice/2023- 24 dated 6.1.2024 issued by the Deputy Commissioner Self employment Ambedkar Nagar contained as ANNEXURE NO. 1 to this writ petition. ii.. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS thereby commanding the opp. Parties to permit the petitioner to discharge his duty as Care take (Adhyaksha) of Laxmi Ajivika Swayam Sahahayata Samooh as she was discharging earlier and also pay the Honorarium moth to month, and also pay the Arrears of remaining Honorarium to the petitioner. iii.. Any other order or direction which this Hon'ble court may deem fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the case may also be passed in favour of the petitioner. iv. Allow the writ petition with cost in favour of the petitioner.." The contention of learned counsel appearing for the petitioner is that the petitioner has been issued notice on 06.01.2024 by the respondent no. 2 and Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ram Prasad Nigam, Rajesh Kumar Shukla, Rajeshwar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh, Prashant Kumar Srivastava Smt. Shakntala Devi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Distt. Magistrate Ambedkar Nagar And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) without passing any order, he has been orally terminated from the services and no work is being taken from. He submitted that interest of justice would be sub-served if this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to give liberty to the petitioner to move a fresh representation before the respondent no. 2 and he may be directed to consider & decide the same, within stipulated period of time as may be fixed by this Court. Learned counsel for the opposite parties have no objection to the contention aforesaid. Be that as it may, without entering into the merit of the case, the petitioner is permitted to move a fresh representation within period of 10 days, and if such representation is moved within aforesaid period, the respondent no. 2/Deputy Commissioner Self Employment, Ambedkar Nagar, is hereby directed to consider and decide the same, within a period of six weeks, in accordance with law, from the date, a certified copy of this order is produced before him. With the aforesaid observations, the instant petition is disposed of. November 14, 2025 Mayank WRIA No. 10654 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench