PAWAN KUMAR THRU. HIS FATHER SHYAM LAL v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME, LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
CRLR/1315/2022 · 2025-11-14
Zafeer Ahmad
Criminal Appealbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 195979 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 195979 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1315 of 2022 Court No. - 31 HON'BLE ZAFEER AHMAD, J. ..
1. List revised. Case called out.
2. Neither learned counsel for the revisionist present nor there is any request to adjourn/pass-over the case on his behalf.
3. This revision has been filed against the impugned judgment and orders dated 18.11.2022 and 13.09.2022 passed in Crl. Appeal No. 48 of 2022 as well as the order dated 13.09.2022 passed by the Juvenile Justice Board, Faizabad whereby the bail application of the revisionist was rejected.
4. The prayer for bail has been allowed by this Court and the revisionist has been released on bail by means of the order dated 06.07.2023 but the revision remains pending. Now, this case is listed under the heading of 'Infructuous Cases'.
5. Office report dated 25.10.2025 also indicates that the revisionist has been granted bail by this Court vide order 06.07.2023 and now nothing remains to be decided in the matter. 6.In view of the aforesaid fact, the revision has lost its efficacy and is rendered infructuous. The revision is accordingly dismissed as infructuous.
November 14, 2025 Shahnaz Versus Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Rohit Upadhyay, Dinesh Chandra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Mukesh Singh (Zafeer Ahmad,J.) Pawan Kumar Thru. His Father Shyam Lal .....Revisionist(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home, Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- SHAHNAZ BANO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench