Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19597 (CHH)

DHANNURAM THAKUR v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/2889/2020 · 2025-07-28

Shri Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:36892 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2889 of 2020 1 - Dhannuram Thakur S/o Rambharose Thakur Aged About 58 Years Present Posted As Deputy-Registrar, Co-Operative Societies, Baloda Bajar, District Baloda Bajar Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, General Administration Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Secretary Co-Operative Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Registrar Co-Operative Society, Raipur Division, Indrawati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Umesh Tiwari Posted As Joint Registrar In The Office Of Joint Registrar, Co- Operative Societies, Tehsil- Ambikapur, District Sarguja, Chhattisgarh. 5 - Mukesh Kumar Dhruv Posted As Managing Director, Maa Danteshwari Sahkari Shakkar Karkhana, Karkabhat, Tehsil And Dist.- Balod, (C.G.). Cum Joint Registrar, Balod In Deputation. 6 - Lakhanlal Vrinjha Posted As Joint In The Office Of Joint Registrar, Co-Operative Societies, Tehsil- Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 7 - Kiran Gupta Posted As Joint Registrar In The Office Of Secretary, Chhattisgarh State Laghu Vanopaj Sangh Maryadit, Tehsil- Raipur In Deputation. 8 - D.P. Tavari Posted As Joint Registrar In The Office Of Joint Registrar, Co- Operative Societies, Tehsil- Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents (Cause-title, as taken from CIS System) For Petitioner : None For State : Mr. Amandeep Singh, Panel Lawyer. RUKHSAR BANO Digitally signed by RUKHSAR BANO Date: 2025.07.29 17:07:54 +0530 2 (Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Order on Board 29/07/2025 1. Despite repeated calls, neither the petitioner appeared nor represented by any counsel. In this circumstance, this Court has no other option except to dismiss the instant petition for want of prosecution. 2. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) JUDGE Rukhsar