Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 195954 (ALL)

STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. NAGER VIKAS ANUBHAG 4 CIVIL SECRT. LKO. AND ANOTHER v. SURESH KUMAR SHARMA AND ANOTHER

SPLAD/275/2024 · 2025-11-21

Arun Bhansali, Jaspreet Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 275 of 2024 Chief Justice's Court HON'BLE ARUN BHANSALI, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE JASPREET SINGH, J. 1. The matter comes up upon an application filed by the respondents seeking disposal of the present appeal in the light of order in State of U.P. and 2 others Vs. Dinesh Rai : Special Appeal No. 230 of 2024 and other connected appeals, decided on 15.09.2025. 2. Submissions have been made that the present appeal arises out of the similar order which was subject matter of appeal in the case of Dinesh Rai (supra) and, therefore, the present appeal may also be decided in light of the said order. 3. The submissions made by counsel for the respondents are not disputed by counsel for the appellants. 4. In the case of Dinesh Rai (supra) it was, inter alia, observed by this Court as under:- "12. In view of the above fact situation, wherein there is no dispute on the fact that the cases of all the respondents are similar to that of Badri Narayan Agnihotri (supra) and Chandra Mohan Yadav (supra), whose cases have attained finality upto Hon’ble Supreme Court, consequently, irrespective of the reliance placed by learned Single Judge in few of the cases in the case of Dr. Shyam Kumar (supra), which apparently had no application, the respondents are entitled to same relief as was accorded to Badri Narayan Agnihotri (supra) and Chandra Mohan Yadav (supra). Versus Counsel for Appellant(s) : Pratul Srivastava (S.C.) Counsel for Respondent(s) : Manish Mishra, Sarvesh Kumar Saxena, Akhilesh Kumar Srivastava, Namit Sharma State of U.P. through Prin. Secy. Nager Vikas Anubhag 4 Civil Secrt. Lko. and another .....Appellant(s) Suresh Kumar Sharma and another .....Respondent(s) 13. Consequently, with the above slight clarification, there is no substance in the special appeals. The same are, therefore, dismissed." 5. In view of the submissions made, the present appeal also stands dismissed in the light of the order passed in the case of Dinesh Rai (supra). November 21, 2025 Rakesh/SL SPLAD No. 275 of 2024 2 (Jaspreet Singh,J.) (Arun Bhansali,CJ.) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH PRAJAPAT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench