RAM GOPAL YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
CRLP/9433/2025 · 2025-10-07
Abdhesh Kumar Chaudhary, Rajesh Singh Chauhan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 195940 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 195940 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9433 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE RAJESH SINGH CHAUHAN, J.
HON'BLE ABDHESH KUMAR CHAUDHARY, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri S P Singh, learned AGA for the State- opposite parties no.1 to 3.
2. In view of the proposed order, notice to opposite party no.4 is hereby dispensed with.
3. By means of this petition, the petitioner has assailed the impugned FIR bearing FIR/Case Crime No.176 of 2025, under Sections 318(4), 336(3), 338, 340(2) of B.N.S. 2023, Police Station Hathigawan, District - Pratapgarh.
4. After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner has requested that the petitioner may be given liberty to file anticipatory bail application before the competent court of law and directions may be issued to decide the same with expedition.
5. Therefore, without entering into merits of the issue and considering the innocuous aforesaid request of learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner is permitted to file anticipatory bail application before the competent court of law and if such anticipatory bail application is filed, the same may be heard and disposed of on its own merit.
6. The writ petition is disposed of. October 7, 2025 J. K. Dinkar Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ghanshyam Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Abdhesh Kumar Chaudhary,J.) (Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.) Ram Gopal Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench