HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 9788 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J. 1. Heard Ms. Chitrangda Narayan, Advocate holding brief of Shri Saroj Kumar Shukla and Shailendra Kumar Misra, learned counsel(s) for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State. 2. Learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State submits that District Magistrate, Unnao has not been made party in the writ petition. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners is directed to carry out the necessary change(s) in the writ petition during the course of the day. 4. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the petitioners are aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the respondent(s) in deciding the representation/application dated 21.11.2024 filed by the petitioners. 5. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that for raising their grievances the petitioners have filed the aforesaid representation/application before the respondent authority, however, the same has not yet been decided. He also submits that the representation/application made before the Mukhya Karyapalak Adhikari be treated as the representation/application before the District Magistrate concerned. 6. Upon due consideration, we are of the view that the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Saroj Kumar Shukla, Shailendra Kumar Misra Counsel for Respondent(s) : Sharad Tewari, C.S.C. Tarun Kumar And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) U.P. Expressways Industrial Development Authority (Upeida) Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) respondent No.5/ District Magistrate, Unnao should be directed to pass a reasoned order on the representation/application of the petitioners. 7. Accordingly, the respondent No.5/ District Magistrate, Unnao is directed to pass a reasoned order upon the aforesaid representation/application of the petitioners in accordance with law within a period of eight weeks from today after granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. 8. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. October 9, 2025 Raj WRIC No. 9788 of 2025 2 (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench