VIKAS JAYANT v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY., P.W.D., LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/14853/2025 · 2025-12-19
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 195913 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 195913 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14853 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Pradeep Kumar Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State, Sri Shishir Jain,
learned counsel for the opposite parties no. 2 to 4 and perused the record. The present writ petition has been filed with the following main reliefs :-
"(i) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties to consider and provide promotion/ notional promotion to the petitioner on the post of Additional Project Manager with effect from December 2020 and fix the pay accordingly. (ii) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties to provide regular promotion to the petitioner on the post of Project Manager with effect from February 2024, the date when the juniors to the petitioner have been given promotion." After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the interest of justice would be sub-served if this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to give liberty to the petitioner to move a fresh representation before the opposite party no. 3/Managing Director, Uttar Pradesh Rajkiya Nirman Nigam Ltd., Vibhuti Khand, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow and the opposite party no. 3 may be directed to consider and decide the same within the stipulated period of time, as may be fixed by this court. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pradeep Kumar Rai, Lallan Rai, Prakarsh Pandey, Praveen Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Shishir Jain Vikas Jayant .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy., P.W.D., Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
Learned counsel appearing for the opposite parties have no objection to the contentions aforesaid. Be that as it may, without entering into the merits of the case,the petitioners are given liberty to move a fresh representation, while raising all his claims and grounds before the opposite party no. 3/Managing Director, Uttar Pradesh Rajkiya Nirman Nigam Ltd., Vibhuti Khand, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow within the period of 15 days form today and if such representation is moved within aforesaid period, the opposite party no. 3 is directed to consider and decide the same within further period of eight weeks, in accordance with law. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is hereby
disposed of.
December 19, 2025 AKS WRIA No. 14853 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench