Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 195909 (ALL)

M/S NANDINI INFRASTRUCTURE THRU. PROPRIETOR KARAN BHUSHAN SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF GEOLOGY AND MINING LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/10801/2025 · 2025-11-21

Manjive Shukla, Shekhar B Saraf

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10801 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. The present writ petition has been filed with the following reliefs:- "i) issue a writ, order or direction or writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned orders dated 06.05.2025 annexed as Annexure No. 01; ii) issue a writ, order or direction or writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned orders dated 15.06.2019 annexed as Annexure No. 02; iii) issue a writ, order or direction or writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents not to take any coercive steps in pursuance to the notice/order dated 06.05.2025 and 15.06.2019;" 3. The writ petition is disposed of with liberty granted to the petitioner to file a revision before the State Authority under Rule 80 of the U.P. Minor Minerals (Concession) Rules, 2021. 4. In the event there has been a delay in filing the revision, the authority concerned is directed to condone the said delay and hear the matter on merits. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashish Kumar Singh, Avinash Chandra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. M/S Nandini Infrastructure Thru. Proprietor Karan Bhushan Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Geology And Mining Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) 5. With the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of. November 21, 2025 Ashutosh WRIC No. 10801 of 2025 2 (Manjive Shukla,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench