[3521 I lN THE HIGH COURT-'OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATll/ THURSDAY ,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF MAY Lrf TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE gr :PRESENT: he/ HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN\,rf/ CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 5613 OF 2025 gr+ / Between: Mittapalle Cffirnna Reddappa Reddy @ Chinnappa Reddy, S/o,Late M.Iragam ZEE Reddy, aged 59 years R/oIMaittavandalapalle H/o.Banddemeedepalli H/o.Peddamandyam Mandal, Annamayya District Andhra Pradesh. `¢rf Pet]Itioner/Accused|5 Lil AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh, Station House Officer, Mudiveurd#ui Police Station, Mudivedu Chittoor District. Rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh At Amaravathi, Guntur District. \d# Respondent/Complainant \`/ V_ _______ _ gr Petition under Section 482 of BNSS (438 of Cr.P.C.,) praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Station House Officer, Mudivedu \/ \, police station, Mudivedu, Chittoor District, Andhra Pradesh to release the V` \hec¢Fct Petitioner/A-5 on bail in,the event of his arrest in connection with F.I.R. No. 51 \,, of 2025 dated 14.03.2025 on the file the Station House Officer, Mudivedu Police Station, Mudivedu, Chittoor District, AP \d# BEEii COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONER : SRl.-GUTTAPALEM VIJAYA KUMAR COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENT : PUBLIC PROSECUTOR BE=EE= THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING ORDER l~,- (CGR,J Crl.P.No.5613 of2025) APHCO10274162025 E]#E] J| IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATl (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3506] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 5613/2025 Between : Mittapalle Chinna Reddappa Reddy @ ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED Chinnappa Reddy AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: 1. GUTTAPALEM VIJAYA KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent/complainant: 1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the followin order: (CGR,J Crl.P.No.5613 of2025) Present Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 (1) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2025 (for brevity lthe BNSS') seeking anticipatory bail with respect to Crime No.51 of 2025 of Mudiveedu Police Station, Annamayya District, registered for the offences punishable under section 329(3), 324(4),109(1) read with 3(5) BNS. The petitioner herein is arrayed as A-5. 2. As per the complaint alleged by the de facfo complainant, on 13.03.2025 accused, Al to A-7, have collectively attacked the c/e racfo complainant with iron rods and axes in order to kill them, however, the cye facfo complainant and his associates, have likely escaped from the said scene and thereafter lodged the present complaint. The entire incident was occurred due to land dispute arose between the accused and the cye facfo complainant. 3. lt is stated that A-1 to A-4 and A-6 have already been arrested and were enlarged on bail. lnsofar as A-7 and A-5 are concerned, their first bail application has been rejected and even the second bail application also came to be rejected. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on bare perusal of the complaint and even on the fact of it, there is no attack or injury, as such, the attempt portrayed as attack and in the absence of any 3 (CGR,J Crl.P.No.5613 of2O25) injuries or medical report: the question of implicating the accused for offences under Section 329(3), 324(4),109(1) read with 3(5) BNS is completely erroneous. 5. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor, on the other hand, opposed to grant anticipatory bail and contends that serious accusations are made against the accused, therefore, they are not entitled for grant of bail. 6. Perused the record and considered the rival submissions. 7. A bare perusal of the complaint goes to show that A-1 to A-7 have tried to attack the de facfo complainant in relation to civil disputes between them, however, no way complaint discloses that there was any real physical attack or cause of injuries and at any rate, the trial Court has already enlarged the other accused on bail, the petitioner herein, is also entitled to consider for anticipatory bail. 8. ln view of the aforesaid submissions, the bail application is ordered with the following directions: a) ln the event of arrest of the petitioner, the petitioner shall be enlarged on bail on his executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.1O,OOO/- (Rupees ten thousand only), with two slJretieS each for the like Sum each to the satisfaction of the arresting police officials; vl¢~,+d^ c - - 4 (CGR,J Crl.P.No.5613 of2025) b) The pctitioner shall make himself available for investigation as and when required; c) The petit-IOner Shall not Cause any threat, inducement or promise to the prosecution witnesses; d) The petitioner shall appear before the station House Officer concerned once in at week i.e., on every Sunday between 10.00 a.m. and 05.00 p.m., till filing of the charge sheet. e) The petitioner shall not leave the District limits without the express permission from the station House Officer concerned. 9. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is allowed. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, jf any, shall stand closed. SD/-M.PRABHAKAR RAO ASS llTF\UE COPYll ISTRAR To, 2. The Station D[-strict, AP For ASSl lSTRAR 1. The " AddjtI'Onal Djstrl'ct Judge, Madanapalle House officer, Mudivedu poll'ce stall-on, Mudivedu, chjttoor one cc to sRl. GUTTAPALEM VIJAYA KUMAR Advocate [opuc] Two ccs to PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, High court ofA.P[OUT] One spare copy \ HIGH COURT CGR,J DATED : 22/05/2025 BAIL ORDER CRLP.No.5613 of 2025 ALLOWED I ¢ €r.`l,:/ ,-+..`,-`.-` __ .,.<L±rd :