SMT. KIRAN AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME, U.P. LUCKNOW AND OTHERS
CRLP/552/2024 · 2025-11-21
Rajnish Kumar, Zafeer Ahmad
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 195873 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 195873 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 552 of 2024 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J.
HON'BLE ZAFEER AHMAD, J.
1. Case called out. None is present on behalf of the petitioners to press the petition. There is no request for pass over or adjournment of the case. 2. This Court had passed the following order on 24.01.2024:-
"Heard. The writ petition has been filed seeking the following reliefs:- i-Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite parties no 1 to 3 to restrain the opposite party no 4 and other family member from terrorizing or harassing or threatening to kill or attacks or victimized the petitioner in the interest of justice. ii- issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commending the opposite parties no 1 to 3 to protect and safeguard the petitioner life and liberty to secure the end of justice. The petitioners claims to have married each other of their own free will and also that on the date of marriage they were major. The girl, however, is the resident of Punjab. Let learned A.G.A. seek instruction in the matter as to whether any F.I.R. has been lodged in the matter at the concerned police station at Punjab against petitioners and also if there is any proof of her age, as only adhar card has been annexed. List on 13.2.2024 as fresh. Till the next date of listing, it is provided that if the petitioners have married each other and were of the age of majority/marriageable age on the date of marriage and they are not wanted in any other criminal case and there is no any valid ground in law for the police to interfere in their peaceful living, then they shall not interfere in the same. However, if they are wanted in any other criminal case, it shall be open for the police to take such measures as may be permissible in law. " Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arun Kumar Gupta Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Smt. Kiran And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home, U.P. Lucknow And Others .....Respondent(s)
3. Learned AGA, on the basis of instructions, submits that no F.I.R. has been lodged against the petitioners, therefore, the question of the petitioners being harassed does not arise. 4. Dismissed for non prosecution.
November 21, 2025 Akanksha Sri/- CRLP No. 552 of 2024 2 (Zafeer Ahmad,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- AKANKSHA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- AKANKSHA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench