M/S ANTILIA ORGANICS PVT. LTD., LKO. THRU. DIRECTOR UDAI SINGH v. BOARD OF REVENUE, THRU. CHAIRMAN LKO. AND OTHERS
A227/7384/2025 · 2025-12-18
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 195870 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 195870 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7384 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
1. Heard Sri Sandeep Dixit, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Rishabh Kapoor, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for respondent nos. 1 and 2, Sri Ratnesh Chandra,
learned counsel appearing for Lucknow Development Authority and Sri Shailendra Singh Chauhan, learned counsel for respondent no. 4. Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record.
2. In the light of proposed order notice to private respondents is dispensed with.
3. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that proceedings were initiated by the Additional District Magistrate (Finance and Revenue, Lucknow under Section 38 and 30(2) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 with regard to property being Khasra No. 315M, situated at Village - Ardaunamau, Lucknow and name of petitioner was deleted and land was recorded in the name of State. Against the said order petitioner has preferred first appeal before the Commissioner, Lucknow Division, Lucknow which was rejected on 18.09.2025 and against order dated 18.09.2025, the petitioner has filed revision before the Board of Revenue which is pending consideration.
4. It has been next submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Azhar Ikram, Aseem Goswami, Rishabh Kapoor Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Ratnesh Chandra, Shailendra Singh Chauhan M/S Antilia Organics Pvt. Ltd., Lko. Thru. Director Udai Singh .....Petitioner(s) Board Of Revenue, Thru. Chairman Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s)
alongwith revision the petitioner has moved an application for interim relief and the Board of Revenue instead of deciding the said application has deferred the matter by means of order dated 13.12.2025. It is further submitted that there is urgency in the matter as the Lucknow Development Authority who has taken over the said land is changing the nature of the land by raising constructions and accordingly, there is urgency in the matter.
5. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that against impugned order dated 21.03.2024, one Dr. Kashmir Singh has also filed revision before the Board of Revenue and the Board of Revenue has interferred in the said matter and passed order granting interim relief by
order dated 04.11.2025, directing the parties to maintain status quo over the land in question therein.
6. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that against same impugned
order interim relief has been granted in favour of Dr. Kashmir Singh in Revision No. 4735 of 2025 (Computerized Case No. R 20251046004735) - Dr. Kashmir Singh Vs. Commissioner, Lucknow Division and Others, then there was no occasion for the Board of Revenue to not to pass similar
order with regard to petitioner and accordingly, statement that similar protection may be granted to the petitioner as was granted in the case of Dr. Kashmir Singh.
7. Accordingly, this Court is of the considered view that petitioner deserves similar treatment as has been given by the Board of Rvenue to Dr. Kashmir Singh.
8. In the light of above, present writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to move another application for interim relief before the Board of Revenue within next one week. The Board of Revenue shall consider and consider and pass necessary orders on the interim relief application within one week from the date of receipt of such application. While deciding the interim relief application the Board of Revenue will taken due account of the this order as well as order passed in the case of Dr. Kashmir Singh.
9. Learned counsel for the respondents undertake that they will cooperate A227 No. 7384 of 2025 2
in the proceedings before the Board of Revenue and they shall not taken any unnecessary adjournments.
10. Till necessary orders are passed in pursuance to the directions issued by this Court, the parties are directed to maintain status quo over the land in dispute, as it exists today.
11. It is made clear that when appropriate orders are passed by the Board of Revenue, protection granted by this Court shall stand vacated. December 18, 2025 A. Verma A227 No. 7384 of 2025 3 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench