ARUSHI MAURYA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND OTHERS
CRLP/12094/2025 · 2025-12-19
Babita Rani, Rajnish Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 195851 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 195851 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 12094 of 2025 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J.
HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J.
1. Shri Avinash Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners states that due to incurable defects in the writ petition, he does not want to press the petition and prays that the same may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file afresh with proper pleadings.
2. Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed with the liberty to file afresh. December 19, 2025 S. Shivhare Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Avinash Pratap Singh, Istekhaf Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Mrs. Babita Rani,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Arushi Maurya And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SHASHANK SHIVHARE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench