NARESH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME U.P. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
BAIL/11061/2024 · 2025-10-09
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 195849 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 195849 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11061 of 2024 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.
2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.62 of 2024, under Sections 323, 504, 376(2)(f) IPC and Sections 5n/6 POCSO Act, P.S. Ranipur, District Bahraich.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that the FIR in question was lodged by own daughter of the applicant. It is argued that the daughter of the applicant had married against his wishes as such an application was filed under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. Subsequently when the husband of the informant was enlarged on bail, as a counerblast the present FIR was filed. The office report indicates that the respondents are not seen for last one year as the service of notice could not be effected. As the issue of personal liberty is involved, the matter was heard with the assistance of learned AGA.
4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is aged above 60 years and in jail since 11.4.2024 having no criminal history is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed.
6. Let the applicant Naresh be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rahul Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Naresh .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 9, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 11061 of 2024 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench