Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19582 (MAD)

MOHAMED ROSHAN v. STATE REP BY, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE

CRL OP/2427/2025 · 2025-03-13

Sunder Mohan

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Crl. O.P. No.2427 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 13.03.2025 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN Crl. O.P. No.2427 of 2025 Mohamed Roshan ... Petitioner / Accused Vs. The Union represented by: The Inspector of Police, S-4 Nandambakkam Police Station, Chennai. (Cr. No.158 of 2024). ... Respondent PRAYER: The Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of BNSS, pleased to enlarge the petitioner on bail, in connection with the Cr. No.158 of 2024, pending investigation on the file of the respondent Police. For Petitioner : Mr.D. Raja For Respondent : Mr. Leonard Arul Joseph Selvam Government Advocate (Crl. Side). O R D E R This Criminal Original Petition has been filed by the petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 23.12.2024 seeking bail in Cr. 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl. O.P. No.2427 of 2025 No.158 of 2024 registered for the offences under Sections 8(c), 22(C) & 29(1) of NDPS Act. 2. The case of the prosecution is that based on secret information, the respondent caught hold of the petitioner and seized MDMA Narcotics tablets each weighing about 0.1142 grams totally 10.28 grams, which is a commercial quantity and that based on his confession, A2 was arrested. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are false; that A2 was granted bail; that the respondent police have not properly weighed the contraband; and that in any case, considering the period of incarceration of the petitioner, further custody of the petitioner is not required and hence prayed for grant of bail. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) appearing for the respondent reiterated the prosecution case and filed the counter of the respondent police. 5. A perusal of the counter affidavit of the respondent would reveal that the 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl. O.P. No.2427 of 2025 petitioner was intercepted and based on secret information, he was found to be in possession of MDMA Narcotics tablets each weighing about 0.1142 grams totally 10.28 grams, which is a commercial quantity. Hence rigors of Section 37 of NDPS Act would be applicable and the petitioner has not satisfied the twin conditions under Section 37 of NDPS Act. 6. Therefore, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage. 7. Accordingly, the Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 13.03.2025 mjs To 1. The Inspector of Police, S-4 Nandambakkam Police Station, Chennai. 2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl. O.P. No.2427 of 2025 SUNDER MOHAN., J. mjs Crl. O.P. No.2427 of 2025 13.03.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis