Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19582 (AP)

VENNAPUSA JOSEPH REDDY v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/13539/2025 · 2025-05-15

Y Lakshmana Rao

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY ,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE v/ ef PRESENT OO THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 13539 OF 2025 Between: Vennapusa Joseph Reddy, S/o. Koti reddy, aged about 60 years, R/o. Srinivas Nagar, Narasaraopeta, Palnadu District. ...PETITIONER AND 1. The State Of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Amaravathi, Guntur District. ^ 2. The Superintendent of Police, Palnadu District. ^ 3. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Narasaraopeta, Palnadu District. 4. . The Circle Inspector, Narasaraopeta Police Station, Palnadu District.^-^^ 5. The Station House Officer, II Town Police Station, Narasaraopeta, Palnadu District. 6. Syed Usman, S/o. Saida Saheb, aged about 55 years, R/o. D. No. 13-4- 64, Vengalreddy Colony, Narsaraopet Town, Palnadu District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction more one in the may nature of Mandamur declaring the action of the Respondent No. 5 in interfering with the pending civil dispute between the petitioner and the 6th respondent herein, by threatening the petitioner to withdrajA/ the recovery of money suit in O.S. No. 2/of 2024 on the file of The XIII Additional District Judge, Narasaraopet is illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction, discriminative and violative of Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and Consequently direct the Respondent No.5 not to insist the petitioner to withdraw the pending civil suit in O.S. No. 27 of 2024 on the file of The XIII Additional District Judge, Narasaraopet. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No.5 mt to insist the petitioner to withdraw the pending civil suit in O S. No. 27 of 2024 on the file of The XIII Additional District Judge, Narasaraopet, pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner(s): SRI. SARANU PHANI TEJA Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 5: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent No.6: NONE APPEARED The Court made the following: ORDER APHC010274632025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] FRIDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 13539/2025 Between: ...PETITIONER Vennapusa Joseph Reddy AND ...RESPONDENT(S) The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: f 1.SARANU PHANI TEJA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR HOME The Court made the following order: th The present Writ Petition is filed to declare the action of the 5 respondent in intefering with the pending civil dispute between the petitioner and the respondent herein, by threatening the petitioner to withdraw the recovery of money suit in O.S.No.27 of 2024, on the file of the learned XIII Additional District Judge, Narasaraopet, is illegal and arbitrary. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. Perused the record. r 2 Dr. YLR,J , W.P.No.13539 of 2025 ^ The apprehension of the petitioner, in the Writ Petition, is that, at the behest of the 6*^ respondent, the 5*^ respondent is threatening the petitioner to withdraw the civil suit in O.S.No.27 of 2024, pending on the file the learned XIII Additional District Judge, Narasaraopet. The 5'^ respondent is directed not to insist the petitioner to withdraw the civil suit. With the above observation, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed Sd/- M. PRABHAKAR RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUECOPY/i SECTION OFFICER To, x/ 1. The Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Palna^ District. 3. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Narasaraopeta, Palnadu District. 4. . The Circle Inspector, Narasaraopeta Nolice Station, Palnadu District. 5. The Station House Officer, II Town Police Station, Narasaraopeta Palnadu District, 6. One CC to Sri. Saranu Phani Teja Advocate [OPUC] 7. Two CCs to GP For Home ,High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 8. THREE CD Copies AL / 'A HIGH COURT DATED:16/05/2025 VACATION COURT ORDER WP.No.13539of2025 DISPOSING OF THE W.P. WITHOUT COSTS C