Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010212752021 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/71/2022 RAJENDRA KUMAR BHANSALI S/O LATE KANHAIYA LAL BHANSALI, A PARTNER OF M/S APOLLO CARRIERS, A RESIDENT OF ASHOKA HOUSE, K. C ROAD, CHATRIBARI, PO GUWAHATI 781001, DIST KAMRUP M ASSAM VERSUS GUWAHATI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND 3 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER. HAVING ITS OFFICE AT PAN BAZAR, PO GUWAHATI , 781001, ASSAM 2:THE COMMISSIONER GUWAHATI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION HAVING ITS OFFICE AT PAN BAZAR PO GUWAHATI 781001 ASSAM 3:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER CENTRAL ZONE GUWAHATI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION HAVING ITS OFFICE AT PAN BAZAR PO GUWAHATI 781001 ASSAM 4:SRI AMOLAK CHAND BHANSALI SON OF LATE JHUMAR MAL BHANSALI SOLE PROPRIETOR OF M.S ASHOKA ROADWAYS Page No.# 2/3 HAVING HIS PLACE OF BUSINESS AT ASHOKA HOUSE K.C ROAD NEAR MAHESWARI BHAWAN CHATRIBARI PO GUWAHATI 781001 ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR J C GAUR, MS. M GAUR Advocate for the Respondent : SC, GMC, MR. S K GUPTA,MS. M K GOGOI,MR. P SARMA,MR T C DAS,MR. O P BHATI BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI ORDER 23.06.2025 None appears for the petitioner on call whereas Shri SK Gupta, learned counsel for the respondent no. 4 and Shri P Nayak, learned Standing Counsel, GMC are present. There has been continuous default on the part of the petitioner to represent and on the last occasion i.e. 18.06.2025, the following order was passed: “18.06.2025 None appears for the petitioner on call whereas Ms. J Rajkumari, learned counsel is present for the Guwahati Municipal Corporation. On earlier two occasions i.e. 04.04.2025 and 26.05.2025, the learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the brief was taken away from him. In the interest of justice, the matter is adjourned to be listed on 23.06.2025 to give further opportunity. It is, however made clear that in the event, there is further non- Page No.# 3/3 representation, this Court would pass appropriate order(s).” In view of the above, it clearly appears that the petitioner is not interested to prosecute this case and accordingly, the same is dismissed for default. JUDGE Comparing Assistant