APHC010275052014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 30968/2014 Between: 1. M/S. ANJANI AGENCIES,, REP. BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, PADALA RAMI REDDY, S/O. SUBBA REDDY, AGED 32 YEARS, RESIDING AT D.NO.63 E.G.DIST. 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP SECRETARY (MUNICIPAL ADMN.) PUBLIC HEALTH DIVISION, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, HYDERABAD. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER, PUBLIC HEALTH DIVISION, RAJAHMUNDRY, E.G.DIST. 3. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PUBLIC HEALTH, DIVISION, RAJAHMUNDRY, E.G.DIST. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. VL N G K MURTHY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP-MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV(AP) 2. GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH FW(AP) IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THE FOURTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 30968/2014 M/S. ANJANI AGENCIES,, REP. BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, PADALA RAMI REDDY, S/O. SUBBA REDDY, AGED 32 YEARS, RESIDING AT D.NO.63-6-16/1, DWARAKA NAGAR, KAKINADA, ...PETITIONER AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (MUNICIPAL ADMN.) PUBLIC HEALTH DIVISION, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, HYDERABAD. THE SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER, PUBLIC HEALTH DIVISION, RAJAHMUNDRY, E.G.DIST. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PUBLIC HEALTH, DIVISION, , E.G.DIST. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: Counsel for the Respondent(S): MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV(AP) GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH FW(AP) IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3457] M/S. ANJANI AGENCIES,, REP. BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, PADALA RAMI REDDY, S/O. SUBBA REDDY, AGED 32 YEARS, 16/1, DWARAKA NAGAR, KAKINADA, ...PETITIONER . BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (MUNICIPAL ADMN.) PUBLIC HEALTH DIVISION, THE SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER, PUBLIC HEALTH DIVISION, THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PUBLIC HEALTH, DIVISION, ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Court directed the Registry to issue notice to the petitioner. 2. The notice sent by this Court to the petitioner was returned unserved with the endorsement “unserved (addressee left),” and no steps have been taken by the petitioner to represent the matter before this Court. 3. There is no representation for the petitioner today. 4. Hence, this Writ Petition is closed, leaving it open to the petitioner to take steps, if so advised. There shall be no orders as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 04.08.2025 PNS