Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 195760 (ALL)

RUBIYAN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME U.P. LKO.

BAIL/10875/2025 · 2025-11-15

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 10875 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. Supplementary affidavit filed by learned counsel for the applicant is taken on record. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.315 of 2024 under sections 80(2), 85 BNS and section 3/4 D.P. Act, Police Station Sidhauli, District Sitapur. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that co-accused father-in-law is enlarged on bail and applicant is the husband of the daughter of the informant. The criminal antecedents of the applicant are duly explained in the supplementary affidavit filed today. 4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances as well as the postmortem report, as per which, cause of death is ante-mortem hanging and there being nothing specific against the applicant, and without commenting upon the merits of the case coupled with the fact that criminal antecedent are duly disclosed in the subsequent affidavit, which are petty offences, the applicant, who is in jail since 17.02.2025 is entitled to be enlarged on Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Seema Kashyap, Devendra Pratap, Kaushal Kishore, Shashank Shekhar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Rubiyan .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant Rubiyan be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 15, 2025 Raj BAIL No. 10875 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench