SANDEEP DUBEY AND 3 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN./ ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
A482/10651/2025 · 2025-12-18
Divesh Chandra Samant
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 195751 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 195751 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10651 of 2025 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE DIVESH CHANDRA SAMANT, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants as well as learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. The present 482 Cr.P.C. application has been filed to quash the impugned chargesheet dated 16.10.2024 filed by the Investigating Officer in FIR/Case Crime No. 0263 of 2024, against the applicants under Section 354Ka, Gha, 504, 506, 34 I.P.C. and Section 67 of I.T. Act, Police Station-Chanda, District-Sultanpur and summoning order dated 04.12.2020 passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Room No. 17, Sultanpur in Criminal Case No. 7067 of 2024 (State Vs. Sandeep Kumar Dubey and others) arising out of FIR/Case Crime No. 0263 of 2024, against applicants under Sections 354Ka, Gha, 50, 506, 34 I.P.C. and Section 67 of I.T. Act, Police Station-Chanda, District- Sultanpur. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant does not want to press the prayer made in the application. He confines his prayer only to the extent that a direction be given to the court concerned to decide the bail application of the applicant in the light of the law laid down by the Apex Court in the cases of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation, reported in 2021 (10) SCC 773. 4. Learned AGA is having no objection, if such a direction is given to the Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Deepak Kumar Pandey, Piyush Agnihotri, Shailesh Sachan Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Sandeep Dubey And 3 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin./ Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
court concerned to decide the bail application of the applicant in the light of the judgment of the Apex Court in the cases of Satender Kumar Antil (supra). 5. Considering the aforesaid alternative prayer made by learned counsel for the applicant, it is directed that the applicant shall surrender before the concerned court below within 30 days from today and in case he applies for bail, the bail application of the applicant shall be disposed of expeditiously by the court below in accordance with law and keeping in view the guidelines as laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra). 6.
For the period of 30 days from today or till the time of surrender of the applicant before the concerned court below, whichever is earlier, applicant shall not be arrested in the above case. 7. With the above observations and directions, this application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is disposed of. December 18, 2025 Karan A482 No. 10651 of 2025 2 (Divesh Chandra Samant,J.) Digitally signed by :- KARAN KUMAR RAO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench