Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 195740 (ALL)

VIKAS VERMA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER

NA528/2083/2025 · 2025-12-11

Brij Raj Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 2083 of 2025 Court No. - 16 HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J. 1. Sri Himanshu Shukla, Advocate, has put in appearance on behalf of respondent No. 2 by filing his Vakalatnama, which is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. and learned counsel for respondent no. 2. 3. This application has been filed by the applicant mainly with the prayer to quash the entire proceeding of Case No. 1551 of 2024 arising out of Session Case No. 1455/2025, Case Crime No. 160/2025 of 2024, Under Sections- 3(5), 351(3) 352, 115 (2), 105 BNSS & 3 (1) Da, 3 (1) Dha, 3(2) (V) Sc./St. Act., Police Station-Fatehpur, District- Barabanki, pending in the Court of learned Special Judge Sc./St. Act., District- Barabanki, on the basis of the compromise between the parties. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that both the parties have amicably compromised their dispute. The compromise which is said to have taken place between the parties is also filed before this Court as ANNEXURE NO. 7 to the application. 5. Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the trial court concerned as such compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties concerned before the Court. 6. Accordingly, this application is disposed of with a direction to the parties concerned to appear before the trial court concerned within 2 weeks from today alongwith original compromise and the trial court is directed to verify the compromise within next 6 weeks. If the aforesaid compromise is verified, a report to that effect shall be prepared by the court and the compromise will be made part of the record. 7. The court concerned in that scenario will allow the parties to obtain Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Vivek Chandra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Vikas Verma .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) certified copy of the report as well as compromise and it will be open to the applicants to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings. 8. For a period of three months, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant in the aforesaid case. 9. Office is directed to return the original compromise deed, if it has been filed, to the learned counsel for the applicant, after taking the photocopy of the same. December 11, 2025 A.Nigam NA528 No. 2083 of 2025 2 (Brij Raj Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench