[2025:RJ-JP:28423] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6876/2025 Dheerraj @ Dheeraj S/o Shaitan Singh, R/o Shahpura Thikriya, Police Station Jajod, District Sikar, Rajasthan. (At Present Confined In District Jail Sikar). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mukesh Dudi, Adv., with Vikash Bajiya, Adv., and Mr. Himanshu Meel, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP with Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, PP and Mr. Abhimanyu Singh Yaduvanshi, Adv., for complainant. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 28/07/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.78/2024 registered at Police Station Reengus, District Sikar for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 409 and 120B of IPC. After completion of investigation, police filed charge-sheet in this matter. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He submits that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate. He further submits that other co-accused persons namely Chetan Sharma, Sanjay Rao @ Sanju, Vijay Kumar Rao, Arjun Lal, Sonu, Nanu Ram, Surendra Kumar Sharma have already been granted benefit [2025:RJ-JP:28423] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-6876/2025] of bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court. He contends that charge-sheet has already been filed and trial of the case will take considerable time in its conclusion. He argues that the petitioner is in custody since 22.04.2025 and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor assisted by learned counsel for the complainant vehemently opposes the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties, especially the fact that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate; other co-accused persons, who are almost similar footing, have been granted benefit of bail by a co- ordinate Bench of this Court; charge-sheet has been filed and trial will take time in its conclusion as well as looking to the period of custody, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner - Dheerraj @ Dheeraj S/o Shaitan Singh shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all [2025:RJ-JP:28423] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-6876/2025] subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J MADAN/158