MOHD. NADEEM AND ANOTHER v. THE STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
NA528/2224/2025 · 2025-12-18
Brij Raj Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 195734 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 195734 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 2224 of 2025 Court No. - 16 HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants and the learned AGA.
2. After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the applicants submits that he does not want to press this application, hence the same may be rejected as such with liberty to the applicants to file a fresh application.
3. In view of the aforesaid statement, application is rejected as not pressed with liberty aforesaid.
4. Office is directed to return the original/certified copies to the counsel for the applicants after retaining the photocopies of the same on record. December 18, 2025 Rao/- Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Samrat Gupta Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Brij Raj Singh,J.) Mohd. Nadeem And Another .....Applicant(s) The State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- CHEBROLU SRINIVASA RAO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench