Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 195732 (ALL)

HRIDAY NATH VISHWAKARMA (PNO-002250058) v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/11477/2025 · 2025-10-07

Shree Prakash Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 11477 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned counsel for opposite parties. 2. Petition has been filed challenging order dated 13.06.2025 whereby petitioner has been transferred from Ayodhya to Ballia. 3. It is submitted that petitioner's case is fully covered with the judgment and order dated 24.07.2025 passed in Writ-A No. 7025 of 2025, whichreads as under:- "1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties. 2. Counter affidavit filed today is taken on record. 3. Earlier on 4th July, 2025 following order had been passed:- "1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties. 2. Petition has been filed challenging order dated 14.06.2025 whereby petitioner has been transferred from Kasganj to Ayodhya on the post of Fireman. 3. It has been submitted that impugned order has been passed against provisions of the Government Order dated 15.02.2024 whereby Three Member Committee has been constituted for purposes of consideration of transfer of Fireman and other similarly situated personnel. It is submitted that the aforesaid Committee indicates Director General Fire Services as Chairman of the Committee with the Director of the Fire Services or the Senior Most Gazetted Officer to be one of the members alongwith a nominee of the Director General. It is submitted that the impugned order has not been Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Birendra Kumar Yadav, Hema Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Hriday Nath Vishwakarma (Pno-002250058) .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) passed in accordance with the Committee constituted by means of the aforesaid Government Order since the Director or the Senior Most Gazetted Officer was not a party to the deliberation pertaining to transfer in the meeting held on 06.06.2025. It is submitted that decision with regard to transfer was required to be taken unanimously by the Committee. 4. It is submitted that prior to effecting transfer, a Circular dated 27.03.2025 was also issued by the department requiring three options to be provided by the employees and in pursuance of which petitioner has submitted three options for District Hathras, Mathura or Firozabad but impugned order has been passed without considering aforesaid options. 5. Learned State Counsel has been provided written instructions dated 03.07.2025, a copy of which is taken on record as well as a copy of the report dated 06.06.2025 indicating that the Director/ Senior Most Gazetted Officer did not participate in the meeting due to his unavailability. In paragraph no.2 of the written instruction dated 03.07.2025, it has been stated that Mr. Ajay Kumar Gupta was the Senior Most Gazetted Officer available in the Department but had been visited with major penalty vide order dated 13.09.2021 which was subsequently set aside by the U.P. State Public Services Tribunal but since the said order passed by the Tribunal was challenged before this Court in Writ Petition No.7037 of 2022, he was not invited to participate in the meeting held on 06.06.2025. 6. Prima facie, submissions advanced by learned counsel for petitioner have force and require consideration for which opposite parties are granted two weeks' time to file counter affidavit particularly indicating whether such an exercise can be re-visited with participation of Committee Members as constituted vide Government Order. 7. List this case on 24.07.2025, as fresh. 8. Till next date of listing, operation of impugned order dated 14.06.2025 shall remain stayed so far as it relates to petitioner." 4. In pursuance thereof, the counter affidavit has been filed and in paragraph 3(B) thereof, it is admitted that a committee was constituted on 6th June, 2025 to consider annual transfer of Fireman but the senior most officer on the post of Deputy Director, Mr. Ajay Kumar Gupta was not included due to punishment order dated 13th September, 2021. The said paragraph clearly indicates that against the said punishment order, Mr. Ajay Kumar had filed a claim petition which was allowed setting aside the punishment order but against the judgment rendered by U.P. State Public Services Tribunal, writ A No. 7037 of 2022 is pending consideration. 5. In view thereof, it is quite evident that provisions of government order dated 15th February, 2024 have not been followed since the committee required to be constituted was not constituted in terms thereof. WRIA No. 11477 of 2025 2 6. Considering aforesaid admission on behalf on the part of opposite parties, the impugned transfer order dated 14th June, 2025 is hereby quashed by issuance of writ in the nature of Certiorari granting liberty to opposite parties to consider the aspect afresh strictly in accordance with government order dated 15th February, 2024. 7. Resultantly the petition succeeds and is allowed. Parties to bear their own cost." 4. It is submitted that the Government Order dated 15.2.2024 have not been followed as the committee has not been constituted and, therefore, transfer order vitiates. He added that now the controversy has been settled by the Judgment and order above said and the case of the present petitioner is squarely covered with the same, thus, the same is also entitled for the same relief. 5. Learned Standing Counsel does not dispute the aforesaid contention. 6. For the foregoing submissions and reasons and looking into the fact that the controversy has already been settled by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, the order impugned dated 13.6.2025 stands quashed. 7. The liberty is granted to the respondents to consider the matter afresh strictly in accordance with the Government Order dated 15.2.2024. 8. The writ petition succeeds and is allowed accordingly. October 7, 2025 Ram Murti WRIA No. 11477 of 2025 3 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAM MURTI YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- RAM MURTI YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench