HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10007 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Shri Anshuman Singh Rathore, the learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Rahul Shukla, the learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State of U.P. and Shri Mohd. Talib, Advocate holding brief of Shri Pankaj Gupta, the learned counsel for the respondent No.7. 2. Learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel has opposed the writ petition on the basis of written instructions received by him which show non-disclosure of complete facts in the writ petition. 3. Confronted with the aforesaid situation, the learned counsel for the petitioner states that he does not want to press the instant petition. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. October 17, 2025 -Amit K- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anshuman Singh Rathore Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pankaj Gupta (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Surya Narayan Mishra .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Lko. And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench