HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 3158 of 2024 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J. 1. The present contempt application has been preferred for alleged non- compliance of order dated 29.03.2024 passed in Writ-A No.2610 of 2024, the relevant extract of the order is quoted hereinbelow: "3. Since considering petitioners' grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioners to file fresh individual representation before opposite party no.3 i.e. Secretary, Basic Education U.P. who shall consider and decide the same within a period of eight weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority along with fresh representation. 4. With aforesaid observations and directions, the petition is finally disposed of" 2. Sri Ran Vijay Singh, learned counsel for the respondent has submitted that the compliance affidavit has already been filed on 04.10.2024 enclosing therein the decision taken on the representation of the applicant. 3. On the other hand learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the decision taken on the representation of the applicant is bad and not tenable in the eyes of law. The applicant is entitle for the benefit of pension under the Old Pension Scheme. 4. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and going through the record of the case, the writ court has only given direction to the authority concerned to take decision on the representation of the applicant, which has already been taken on 1.10.2024, copy of which has been annexed as CA. 2 to the compliance affidavit. The legality of the order cannot be Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sajjad Husain Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Ran Vijay Singh, Jyoti Prakash Jitendra Pal Singh And Ors. .....Applicant(s) Sri Surendra Kumar Tiwari, Secy. Basic Parishad Prayagraj U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) decided in the contempt proceedings. Hence, the order passed by the writ court has been complied with and the contempt application has become infructuous and it is dismissed as such. 5. Notice, if any, issued against the respondent stands discharged. October 10, 2025 S. Kumar CAPL No. 3158 of 2024 2 (Manish Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- SANTOSH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench