Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 195691 (ALL)

KAMLESH KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT. LKO. AND 5 OTHERS

WPIL/1164/2025 · 2025-11-17

Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 1164 of 2025 Court No. - 19 HON'BLE RAM MANOHAR NARAYAN MISHRA, J. 1. Instructions received from the Tehsildar, Raniganj, Pratapgarh, are taken on record. 2. At the outset, Shri Hari Om Singh, learned Standing Counsel informs this Court that as per communication received from the Tehsildar, Raniganj, Pratapgarh, the encroachments mentioned with regard to Plot No.249 area 1.4820 hectares and Plot No.247 area 0.2180 hectare have been removed and the encroachers have been ejected from the land in question. After ejectment and removal of encroachment, whatever portion of the constructions remain, it is in the nature of khandahar (dilapidated) over which no body is in possession and said plots are completely protected. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in light of said communication produced by learned counsel for the State respondents, the petition may be disposed of being infructuous in course of time. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anil Kumar Nishad Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pankaj Gupta Kamlesh Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) 4. The petition stands disposed off as being infructuous in view of grant of prayer of removal of encroachment by the State agency during pendency of the petition. November 17, 2025 KR WPIL No. 1164 of 2025 2 (Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra,J.) Digitally signed by :- RABINDRA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench