BRAJNANDAN TIWARI S/O CHINTAMANI TRIPATHI (MAJOR B.C.) v. State of U.P.THRU.PRIN.SECY.HOME LKO.AND OTHERS
BAILC/38/2022 · 2025-11-15
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 195674 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 195674 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL CANCELLATION APPLICATION No. - 38 of 2022 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned Counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and Sri Shashank Tripathi, learned Counsel for the accused.
2. The present bail cancellation has been filed seeking cancellation of bail granted to the accused on 09.02.2021.
3. The submission of the Counsel for the applicant is that the affidavit filed on behalf of the accused was wrong.
4. Considering the fact that substantial time has elapsed; the accused is a lady and there being no material to suggest any good ground to cancel the bail at this stage, the bail cancellation application is rejected. November 15, 2025 akverma Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Tanay Hazari, Alka Verma Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Anurag Shukla (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Brajnandan Tiwari S/O Chintamani Tripathi (Major B.C.) .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P.Thru.Prin.Secy.Home Lko.And Others .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench