SRI POOJAIAH v. M/s. Iffco-Tokyo General Insurance Company Ltd.,
MFA/2661/2020 · 2025-03-08
Lok Adalath
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 19567 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 19567 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF MARCH 2025
CONCILIATORS PRESENT:
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K.
AND
SRI. X.M. JOSEPH, MEMBER
M.F.A.No. 2661/2020 (MV) (Lok Adalat No. 751/2025) BETWEEN:
1. Sri. Poojaiah S/o Late Gujjappa, Aged about 54 years.
2. Smt. Rangalakshmamma W/o Poojaiah @ Poojappa, Aged about 49 years.
3. Kumari. Ashwini D/o Poojaiah @ Poojappa, Aged about 17 years. (Since the appellant No.3 is Minor she is Rep. by her father Sri. Poojaiah).
All are R/at Reddihalli, Midigeshi Hobli, R. Gollahalli, Tumkur District – 572 133.
...APPELLANTS
(By Sri. Supreeth B.P., Advocate)
2 AND:
1.
M/s. IFFCO-TOKYO General Insurance Co. Ltd., Regional Office, No.8, III Main, V Floor, Shanthi Towers, East to NGF Layout, Kasturi Nagara, Bengaluru-560 043, Rep. by its Manager.
2. Sri. A. Byre Gowda, Major, S/o Anandanappa, Yashodha Nagar, Opp. Jakkur Aerodrome, Bengaluru – 560 064.
…RESPONDENTS
(By Sri. B.C. Shivanne Gowda, Advocate for R-1, Notice to R-2 – d/w v.c.o. dated 17.11.2023)
MFA FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 07.06.2018 PASSED IN MVC NO. 5070/2017 ON THE FILE OF THE IX ADDL. SMALL CAUSES JUDGE & XXXIV ACMM, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES AND MEMBER, MACT-7, BANGALORE, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED.
CONCILIATION ORDER
The learned Counsel appearing for the Appellants – claimants is present.
2. Learned Counsel for the appellants – claimants has filed a Memo for Withdrawal and seeks the leave of the Lok Adalath to withdraw the above appeal as not pressed.
3
3. In view of the Memo, the appellants – claimants are permitted to withdraw the above appeal. The said memo is placed on record. Accordingly, the above Miscellaneous First Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Draw up the Award accordingly.
Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER
Rbv