Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 195663 (MAD)

S.MAHALAKSHMI v. THE COMMISSIONER OF LAND ADMINISTRATION

WP/47613/2025 · 2025-12-10

Abdul Quddhose

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 47613 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 10-12-2025 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE WP No. 47613 of 2025 S.Mahalakshmi, W/o. Late Samu No. 423 Ramanickenpet, Vaniyambadi Taluk Tirupattur District 635 801 ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1.The Commissioner Of Land Administration, Ezhilagam Chepuak, Chennai-5 2.The District Collector, Collectorate, Thirupathur 635 601 Thirupathur District 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Vaniyambadi 635 601 Tirupattur District 4.The Revenue Tahsildar, Vaniyambadi Taluk 635 751 Tirupattur District 5.KRISHNANS, /o. Late. Lakshmana Goundar, Ramanaickenpet Village, Ramanaickenpet Post 635 801 Vaniyambadi Taluk Tirupattur District 6.K.Chakravarthi, S/o. Krishnan Ramanaickenpet Village, Ramanaickenpet Post 635 801 Vaniyambadi Taluk Tirupattur District 7.K.Purusothaman, S/o. Krishnan Ramanaickenpet Village, Ramanaickenpet Post 635 801 Vaniyambadi Taluk Tirupattur District 8.NIJALINGAM, S/o. Late Venkatesan Ramanaickenpet Village, Ramanaickenpet Post 635 801 Vaniyambadi Taluk Tirupattur District 9.KASTHURI, W/o. Late Elumalai Ramanaickenpet Village, Ramanaickenpet Post 635 801 Vaniyambadi Taluk Tirupattur District 10.MURUGAYEEAMMAL, W/o. Late __________Page 1 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 47613 of 2025 Venkatesan Ramanaickenpet Village, Ramanaickenpet Post 635 801 Vaniyambadi Taluk Tirupattur District ..Respondent(s) directing the respondents 1 to 4 to cancel the assignment patta granted to the respondents 5 to 10 in respect of the lands measuring 30 Acres comprised in SF Nos. 227/1 , 227/2 , 228/1 , 202/4 , 202/19 , 202/20, 202/17 , 202/18, 226/3 and 202/13 by considering the petitioner’s representations dated 22.05.2023 and 30.05.2025. For Petitioner(s): Mr. N. MANOKARAN For Respondent(s): MR.S.ARUMUGAM, GA (R1 to R4) ORDER This writ petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the respondents 1 to 4 to cancel the assignment patta granted to the respondents 5 to 10 for the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, based on the petitioner’s representations dated 22.05.2023 and 30.05.2025, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. 2. The petitioner claims that assignment patta granted in favour of the respondents 5 to 10 for the subject property is illegal, as she has been in possession of the subject property. The petitioner has sought for cancellation of assignment patta standing in the name of the respondents 5 to 10 by giving representations dated 22.05.2023 and 30.05.2025 to the official respondents. __________Page 2 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 47613 of 2025 Since her representations have not been considered till date, the petitioner has filed this writ petition. 3. Mr.S.Arumugam, learned Government Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents 1 to 4, and on instructions, he would submit that the District Revenue Officer has already forwarded the aforesaid representations of the petitioner to the fourth respondent. 4. Since no adverse orders are passed against the respondents 5 to 10, notice to the respondents 5 to 10 in this writ petition is dispensed with. 5. No prejudice will be caused to the fourth respondent, if the petitioner’s aforesaid representations are considered on merits and in accordance with law, after hearing the objections from the respondents 5 to 10 and any other party as the fourth respondent deems fit to enquire. Accordingly, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the aforesaid representations of the petitioner, directs the fourth respondent to pass final orders, on merits and in accordance with law, on the aforesaid representations of the petitioner seeking for cancellation of assignment patta granted to the respondents 5 to 10 for the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, after hearing the objections from the respondents 5 to 10 and any other party as the fourth respondent deems fit to enquire. The fourth respondent is directed to complete __________Page 3 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 47613 of 2025 the aforesaid exercise within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. With the aforesaid directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No Costs. 10-12-2025 Neutral Citation: Yes/No RKM To 1.The Commissioner Of Land Administration, Ezhilagam Chepuak, Chennai-5 2.The District Collector, Collectorate, Thirupathur 635 601 Thirupathur District 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Vaniyambadi 635 601 Tirupattur District 4.The Revenue Tahsildar, Vaniyambadi Taluk 635 751 Tirupattur District. __________Page 4 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 47613 of 2025 ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J. RKM WP No. 47613 of 2025 10-12-2025 __________Page 5 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis