MURTAZA ALI ANSARI (HEAD CONSTABLE , PNO-872350076) v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIA/11833/2025 · 2025-10-09
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 195652 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 195652 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 11833 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
1. Petitioner is granted liberty to incorporate prayer with regard to relief which is seeking for promotion, during the course of the day.
2. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for the opposite parties.
3. Present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking a direction to authority concerned to consider petitioner's case for promotion on the post of Sub-Inspector from the date when it was due.
4. Since considering petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to file fresh representation before opposite party no.2 i.e. Superintendent of Police, Establishment, Director General Police Headquarter, Lucknow, U.P. who shall consider and decide the same within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of fresh representation along with a certified copy of this order.
5. With aforesaid direction(s), the petition is finally disposed of. October 9, 2025 lakshman Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mahendra Kumar Tripathi, Manish Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Murtaza Ali Ansari (Head Constable , Pno- 872350076) .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- LAKSHMANA KUMAR TAMMANA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench