NEERAJ @ DEEPU v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO AND ANOTHER
BAIL/9744/2025 · 2025-10-10
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 195643 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 195643 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9744 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and Sri Jaikaran, who has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of Informant. The Vakalatnama is taken on record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.265 of 2025, under Sections 69, 115(2), 332(C), 352, 351(3) BNS, Police Station Ashiyana, District Lucknow. 3. In terms of the FIR, it was alleged that the informant used to stay at Lucknow where she met the applicant and around three years ago, on the false pretext of marriage, relations were formed in between the parties. Subsequently, it is alleged that the applicant used to demand money and extended force for making relation. It was also stated that certain amount was also given by the informant to the applicant. 4. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer. 5. Considering the fact that the informant is aged about 24 years; physical relations admittedly continued over a span of three years; there being no recovery of inappropriate photographs coupled with the fact that the applicant has no criminal antecedents and is languishing in jail since 16.08.2025, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Nirmal Singh Yadav, Divya Yadav, Pranjali Mirdha Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Neeraj @ Deepu .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
6. Let the applicant Neeraj @ Deepu be released on bail in the abovesaid first information report number on his furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
October 10, 2025 akverma BAIL No. 9744 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench