APHC010275072016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] THURSDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 2548/2016 Between: Surinder Pal Singh ...PETITIONER AND The State of A.P. rep. by Spl. P.P for CBI Case ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. C SHARAN REDDY Counsel for the Respondent: 1. P S P SURESH KUMAR, Spl. Public Prosecutor for CBI The Court made the following: ORDER: Sri Shaik Ismail, learned counsel, representing Sri C.Sharan Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the case has become infructuous inasmuch as the trial has been commenced, and the learned counsel for the respondent reports no objection. In view of the same, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J. Date: 13.03.2025 sj 86 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 2548 of 2016 Date: 13.03.2025 sj