VED PRAKASH PATHAK v. PRESCRIBED AUTHORITY/WORKMAN COMPENSATION U.P. LKO. and 3 ORS
FAFOD/819/2016 · 2025-12-18
Prashant Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 195611 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 195611 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER DEFECTIVE No. - 819 of 2016 Court No. - 19 HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J.
1. Case called out in the revised call.
2. No one appeared on behalf of the appellant(s) to press this appeal nor there is any request to adjourn or pass over the case. Shri Prasoon Kumar Rai, learned counsel for the respondents is present.
3. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. December 18, 2025 Anupam S/- Versus Counsel for Appellant(s) : Savita Jain, Bhanu Pratap Singh, Dinesh Chandra Tewari, Suresh Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : Prasoon Kumar Rai (Prashant Kumar,J.) Ved Prakash Pathak .....Appellant(s) Prescribed Authority/Workman Compensation U.P. Lko. And 3 Ors .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANUPAM SINGH PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench