Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
~| IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARA THURSDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF MAY I/. TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE :PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 5649 OF 2025 Betwee n :
1. Dussa lndira Rani, W/o. Sadu Narasimhulu Aged about 60 years, R/o. ll-4-636, FIat no. 406 Apex Apartments, Masab Tank, Kairtabad, Hyderabad, Telangana -500004
2. Sadu Narasimhulu, S/o. Sadu subba rayyudu Aged about 61 years, R/o. 13-2-179, flat no. 206-a Rajahamsa KI-ngdOm Apartments, Revenue COIOny Ananthapur, Ananthapur district, Andhra Pradesh Petitioners/Accused 2 & 3 AND The State ofAndhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, HI-gh Court for the State ofAndhra Pradesh, at Amaravati Through SHO, Manila UPS, Eluru, Eluru district Respondent/Comp]ainant Petition under section 482 of BNSS (438 of Cr.P.C.,) praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the crI'minal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to the petitioners/Accused No.2 and 3 on baI-I in the event of arrest in FIR No. 51/2025, dated 07.05.2025, U/S. 69,115(2), 351 (2), 318 (2) , r/w. 3(5) BNS on the fI-Ie of Manila Urban Police Station, Eluru, Eluru District by granting Anticipatory Bail to the Petitioners/Accused No.2and3
hpHCO10275052025 petition under section 528 of BNSS praying that in. the Circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the H'lgh Court may be pleased to direct the respondent/police to not to arrest the pet',tioners/Accused no. 2 and 3 herein in FIR No. 51/2025 dated. 07-05-2025 on the file Of Mahlla urban police station, Eluru, Eluru district U/S. 69,115(2), 351 (2), 318(2) I/w 3(5) BNS pending disposal Of the Present Crimlnal Petition and tO Pass, pending disposal of CRLP 5649 of 2025, on the file Of the High Court. The petition coming On for hear-lng, upon Perusing the Petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and the order of the High Court dated'.22.05.2025 and upon hearing the arguments Of M/S. PILLIX LAW FIRM Advocate for the Petit'lonerS, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the Respondent and the court made the following The petitioners are parents of the lSt accused. The lst petitioner is the mother aged about 60 years and the 2nd petitioner is the father aged about 61 years. The petitioners are also alleged of committing offence under Section 69,115(2), 351 (2), 318(2) r/w 3(5) of BNS. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor.
3. The entire allegations as seen from the complaint would revolve around the 1 St accused. ___ -,,-SSO A 1
2
4. consl'dering the same, thIS Court IS jncllned to grant ba" to the4 petI'tI'Oners jn the event of their arrest, subject to the followI'ng condition.I- o The petJtlOners sha" be enlarged on ba" ln the event of {hel'r arrest upon furnI'Shl-ng a personal bond for Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand only) each, along with two suretleS for a like sum each, to the satl-sfactl'on of the stall-On House offlcer, Mahlla Urban poII'Ce StatIOn, Eluru, Eluru DI-Strict. 5. wI'th the above condI'tiOn, the crI'minal petition js a"owed. Miscellaneous petltlOns, lf any pendlng, ln the crI-mI'nal Petition, sha" stand closed. T` \ llTF`uE COPYll ASSs£ESDc¥iA¥NoTREeATESRRAR FoL . I__.`_ I , `.. . ]`L`JI`J I T`AI` -\ i=i /,.i , I:€,-I To]
1. The Station House officer, MahI-Ia Urban Police Station, Eluru, Eluru district
2. One CC to M/S. PILLIX LAW FIRM Advocate [OPUC]
3. Two CCs to PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, High Court ofA.P[OUT]
4. One spare copy
* •\ HIGH COURT HN,J DATED :29/05/2025 BAIL ORDER CRLP.No.5649 of 2025 ALLOWED ~4ri~::_i:f|€= ::is:j§}¢"rf/;i`1;`fu}thi*j;:;,; •t_v`-..i,\ ,i i C' ct-4,r;''~Jii