RAM PAL v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT., LKO. AND OTHERS
WRIC/11842/2025 · 2025-12-11
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 195609 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 195609 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 11842 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
1. Heard Ms. Kaneez Fatima holding brief of Shri Sanjeev Kumar Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the respondents no. 1 to 4 and Shri Mohan Singh, learned cousnel for respondent no.5. 2. The present petition has been filed for the following main relief(s):-
"I. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of Mandamus direct the opposite party nos.2 to 4 and entry the name transferable land rights revenue records/ Khatauni Fasli year 1425-1430 Khata No. 00693 Land Gata / Khasra No. 22 Min. area 0.1500 Hectare Agriculture Land Village Baina Teekarhar, Tehsil Fatehpur Pargana Kursi District Barabanki under Section 76(2) (3) Uttar Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 2006 allotted the patta/ lease named of the petitioner agriculture land U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act in favour of the petitioner. II. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the opposite parties no. 2 to 4 to decide the representation/ application moved by the petitioners by hand and register post on dated 25.9.2025 in accordance with law under Section 76(2) (3) Uttar Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 2006 contained as Annexure No.5 to this petition."
3. Taking note of the facts as stated as also the period of pendency of application in issue, this petition is disposed of with direction to opposite party no.4- Tehsildar, Tehsil, Fatehpur- District- Barabanki to consider and decide the pending application, quoted in the prayer clause, most expeditiously, after affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, including Village Panchayat concerned and State of U.P., Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sanjeev Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh Ram Pal .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Revenue Deptt., Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s)
without granting any unnecessary adjournment to any of the parties, preferably within a period of three months from the production of certified copy of this order, if there is no other legal impediment in this regard. 4. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either party on merits and the Authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. 5. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of.
December 11, 2025 Muk WRIC No. 11842 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHD UMAR KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench