Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19560 (CHH)

MANHARAN LAL AGAHRIYA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPL/116/2019 · 2025-04-30

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:19613 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPL No. 116 of 2019 • Manharan Lal Agahriya S/o Late Shri Kashiram Agahriya Aged About 54 Years R/o Village And Post - Kapan Tahsil - Akaltra, District : Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Water Resources, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2. Research Officer Quality Control Unit Sakti, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. K.P.S. Gandhi, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. Topilal Bareth, Panel Lawyer Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 30/04/2025 1. The petitioner has filed this petition seeking the following relief(s):- “10.1 This Hon’ble Court be pleased to call for the entire record from the respondent authority as well as call for the records of the Case No. 64/ID Act/Ref./2013. 10.2 This Hon’ble Court be pleased to set aside the award dated 14/09/2018 passed by the learned Presiding Officer under the Industrial Dispute Act cum Labour Court, Janjgeer- Champa in Case No. 64/ID Act/2013 (reference) pronounced on 14.11.2018. 10.3 This Hon’ble Court be pleased to further hold that the action on the part of respondent in respect of termination/ retrenchment of the petitioner is illegal and contrary to the provision of Industrial Dispute Act, 1947. Digitally signed by RAMESH KUMAR VATTI 2 10.4 This Hon’ble Court be pleased to direct the respondent authority to reinstate the petitioner in service with all consequential benefit including back wages and continuity of service. 10.5 Any other relief as deemed fit by this Hon’ble Court.” 2. At the very outset, Mr. K.P.S. Gandhi, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition. 3. No objection from other side. 4. Permission granted. 5. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge vatti