Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 195595 (ALL)

LALTA PRASAD YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND OTHERS

CRLP/9268/2025 · 2025-10-09

Abdhesh Kumar Chaudhary, Abdul Moin

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9268 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. HON'BLE ABDHESH KUMAR CHAUDHARY, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AGA for the respondents no.1 to 4. 2. Notice to respondents no.5 to 9 is dispensed with in view of order proposed to be passed. 3. Instant petition has been filed praying for a mandamus commanding the respondents to conduct fair and proper investigation in pursuance to FIR No.0079 of 2025 under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 303(2), 333, 352 and 351(3) of B.N.S., 2023, Police Station Munshiganj, District Amethi. 4. On the other hand, learned AGA on the basis of instructions sent by Sri Raj Kumar Singh, Sub-Inspector, Police Station Munshiganj, Amethi, states that a final report has been submitted in the matter. 5. Upon the same being pointed out learned counsel for the petitioner states that he does not intend to press the writ petition and prays that the same may be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to pursue other remedy as may be available to him under law. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. October 9, 2025 A. Katiyar Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ravi Shankar Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Abdhesh Kumar Chaudhary,J.) (Abdul Moin,J.) Lalta Prasad Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KATIYAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench