CHAUDHI LAL v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME U.P. LKO. AND ANOTHER
/10284/2025 · 2025-12-08
Brij Raj Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 195575 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 195575 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10284 of 2025 Court No. - 16 HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J. Sri Vishun Narain, Advocate, is present for the opposite party No. 2, by filing his vakalatnama, which is taken on record. This application has been filed by the applicant with the prayer to quash the entire proceedings of the impugned Complaint Case No. 462 of 2022, Raju Vs Chaundhi Lal & another, under Sections 34, 420, 467, 468 of I.P.C. Police Station Para, District Lucknow, as also of the impugned summoning order dated 03.04.2024 and its consequential order passed by the court of Special Additional Civil Judge S.D./A.C.J.M. Court, No. 20, District Lucknow, in the said case, contained as Annexure no. 1 to memo of the application, in the respect of applicant. After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the applicant submits that he does not want to press this application on merit and he further submits that applicant may be granted 4 week's time to surrender before the trial court. Learned A.G.A. has no objection in grant of aforesaid prayer. In view of the above, the application is dismissed with the liberty, as aforesaid. In case any such application is filed by the Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Anjum Ara, Mohammad Irfan Siddiqui Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Chaudhi Lal .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
applicant, same will be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with law. December 8, 2025 A.Nigam A482 No. 10284 of 2025 2 (Brij Raj Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench