Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 195547 (MAD)

B.SARAVANAN v. THE COMMISSIONER

WP/42792/2025 · 2025-11-14

G Arul Murugan

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.No.42792 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 14.11.2025 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN W.P.No.42792 of 2025 B.Saravanan S/o.Balu, No.1, New Street, T.Nagar, Chennai-600 017. Petitioner Vs 1.The Commissioner The Greater Chennai Corporation, Rippon Building, P.H.Road, Chennai-600 003. 2.The Zonal Officer Zone-5, Corporation of Chennai, No.61, Basin Bridge Road, Chennai-600 021. 3.The Joint Commissioner of Police (Traffic) O/o.The Commissioner of Police, Veppery, Chennai-600 007 4.The Director TN Fire & Rescue Services Marshalls Road, Komaleaswaranpet, Egmore, Chennai-600 008. ______________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.42792 of 2025 5.M/s.S.S.Hyderabad Biriyani Rep. by its Manager, No.154/319, Lingu Chetty Street, Opposite: Madras High Court, Chennai-600 001. Respondents PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing to the respondents 1 to 3 consider and act upon the petitioner representation dated 09.06.2025 upon the illegal encroachment and other fire safety and traffic issues at the Lingu Chetty Street, Chennai-600 001 caused by the 5th respondent, within a time frame fixed by this Honourable Court. For Petitioner: Mr.K.Seetharam For Respondents: Mr.S.Gopinathan Standing Counsel for respondent Nos.1 and 2 Mr.R.Muniyapparaj, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.3 Mr.M.Habeeb Rahman, Government Advocate for respondent No.4 ______________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.42792 of 2025 ORDER (Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) Heard. 2. This public interest litigation has been filed by the petitioner alleging that respondent No.5 is running a restaurant without having proper fire safety measures. The petition is vague and does not refer to any provision of law or regulatory regime under local laws as to what kind of permission respondent No.5 is required to obtain before establishing the restaurant. 3. The writ petition is dismissed with liberty to file proper petition. There shall be no order as to costs. (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CJ) (G.ARUL MURUGAN,J) 14.11.2025 Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No bbr ______________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.42792 of 2025 To: 1.The Commissioner The Greater Chennai Corporation, Rippon Building, P.H.Road, Chennai-600 003. 2.The Zonal Officer Zone-5, Corporation of Chennai, No.61, Basin Bridge Road, Chennai-600 021. 3.The Joint Commissioner of Police (Traffic) O/o.The Commissioner of Police, Veppery, Chennai-600 007 4.The Director TN Fire & Rescue Services Marshalls Road, Komaleaswaranpet, Egmore, Chennai-600 008. ______________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.42792 of 2025 THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND G.ARUL MURUGAN,J. bbr W.P.No.42792 of 2025 14.11.2025 ______________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis