MOHIT KUMAR (S.I PNO-152331377) v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/11055/2025 · 2025-09-18
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 195546 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 195546 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 11055 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties.
2. Petition has been filed challenging punishment order dated 11.08.2022 and the appellate order dated 20.12.2022.
3. Ms. Parul Bajpai, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of opposite parties has raised a preliminary objection regrading maintainability of this petition before this Court at Lucknow in view of the fact that impugned orders have been passed at Gautam Buddha Nagar and no part cause of action accrues before this Court at Lucknow.
4. Learned counsel for petitioner in rebuttal submits that since petitioner is posted within the territorial jurisdiction of Lucknow, it will constitute a part cause of action.
5. Considering submissions advanced by learned counsel for parties and perusal of material on record, it is evident that impugned orders have been passed in Gautam Buddha Nagar which is not within territorial jurisdiction of this Court.
6. It is also submitted that petitioner even otherwise has a remedy of filing revision before the State Government.
7. In view of such objections being raised, learned counsel for petitioner prays for liberty to be granted to approach the revisional authority. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ram Charitra Pandey, Shashank Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Mohit Kumar (S.I Pno-152331377) .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
8. In such circumstances, it is provided that in case petitioner prefers a revision before the State Government against the aforesaid orders, the same may be decided expeditiously within a period of eight weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is served upon opposite party no.1.
9. With aforesaid directions, petition stands disposed of. September 18, 2025 Satish WRIA No. 11055 of 2025 2 (Manish Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- SATISH KUMAR BHARATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench