Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 195544 (ALL)

DINESH KUMAR CHAUDHARY AND 164 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF MEDICAL AND HEALTH LKO. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIA/14690/2025 · 2025-12-17

Manish Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14690 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned state counsel for opposite parties. 2. Petition has been filed seeking following prayers:- "1-Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus, commanding the opposite party no.1 to give the grade pay of Rs. 4200/- in the pay scale of Rs.9300- 34800/- to the petitioners as well as to fix salary in VII pay commission on the basis of the grade pay in tune of Rs. 4200 (Rs.9300-34800) to the petitioners on the basis of the recommendation dated 14-10-2010 and recommendation dated 27-11-2012 of the opposite party no. 4 and recommendation dated 22-06-2015 of the opposite party no. 2 which are contained as Annexure No. 5, 6 and 7 to the Writ Petition. II- A writ, order of direction in the nature of mandamus, commanding the opposite parties to revise the salary of the petitioners after giving the grade pay of Rs. 4200 in pay scale of Rs. 9300-34800, as well as to fix the salary in 7th Pay commission and to give arrears of salary with 12% interest. III- Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus, commanding the opposite parties to take a decision of cadre review as the cadre review has been done of all paramedical staff. IV. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus, commanding the opposite parties to implement or complete the proceeding in respect of the grievance of the petitioner regarding cadre review, grade pay and other grievance on the basis of the letter dated 19-02-2016 issued by the State Government which is contained as Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ramesh Kumar Srivastava, Sachin Dixit Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Dinesh Kumar Chaudhary And 164 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Medical And Health Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Annexure No. 10 to the Writ Petition." 3. Since petitioner's grievances would require consideration of factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to make a fresh representation before opposite party No. 1, 5 or any other competent authority. In case such a representation is filed, the same is required to be decided taking into account recommendations made by opposite parties in case the same are required to be followed, within a period of eight weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the concerned authority. 4. The petition stands disposed of. December 17, 2025 prabhat WRIA No. 14690 of 2025 2 (Manish Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- PRABHAT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench