Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19554 (PNJ)

MANISHA SHARMA v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CWP/2575/2025 · 2025-01-30

Aman Chaudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN TH 138 Manisha Sharma State of Punjab CORAM: HO Present: Mr Mr *** AMAN CHAUD 1. Lea Specialist Consu which was exten have been dispe to file a detailed bound manner. 2. Lea 3. Dis within a perio expeditiously, in 30.01.2025 ashok Wh Wh N THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB CHANDIGARH CWP-257 Date of de harma Versus unjab and others HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN Mr. Vipin Mahajan, Advocate for t Mr. Amarpreet Singh Bains, AAG, *** HAUDHARY, J. (Oral) Learned counsel submits that the p Consultant pursuant to advertisement s extended, however, during subsisten dispensed with. He, thus, prays for w etailed representation, which may be nner. Learned State counsel has no objec Dismissed as withdrawn. In case p period of 2 weeks, the same sh , in accordance with law. ( A Whether speaking/reasoned : Ye Whether reportable : Ye NJAB AND HARYANA AT GARH 2575-2025 (O&M) te of decision: 30.01.2025 ..Petitioner ..Respondents AMAN CHAUDHARY e for the petitioner. AAG, Punjab. t the petitioner was working as Senio ement (Annexure P1) w.e.f. 12.04.202 sistence of the said period, her service s for withdrawal of the present petitio ay be directed to be decided in a tim objection to the limited prayer made. case petitioner submits a representatio e shall be considered and decide ( AMAN CHAUDHARY ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No s Senior 04.2023 vices petition ime made. entation decided ASHOK KUMAR 2025.01.31 11:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document